|
Post by luannlockhart on Jan 14, 2007 2:55:23 GMT -5
this might be a rumor but i heard that hannah montana reeplaced potf!
|
|
mrduff04
Berwick's Angel
Save Phil!
Posts: 158
|
Post by mrduff04 on Jan 14, 2007 9:31:43 GMT -5
No one knows for sure why it was cancelled but amy bruckner said it was so successful they could take the money from "phil" and make another season or another show. hannah montanna singing =
|
|
|
Post by friendspheely5604 on Jan 15, 2007 14:51:40 GMT -5
NO, cory in the house did.
|
|
|
Post by Femtimon on Jan 15, 2007 16:05:07 GMT -5
i didn't think anything replaced it..the show that was supposed to replace it got cancelled remember? how would Cory in the House replace it? wouldnt it make more sense that they replaced Thats So Raven with that?
oh and mrduff, alot of us have a pretty good idea why it was cancelled. mostly the members of savepotf yahoo group though
|
|
|
Post by 1PhEeLyGuRl on Jan 16, 2007 9:46:06 GMT -5
Yea, Cory in the House Replaced TSR. Because it's a Spin Off.
But Hannah Montana was filming before Disney decided to cancel Phil wasn't it?
|
|
|
Post by anitrain on Jan 16, 2007 13:27:33 GMT -5
But Hannah Montana was filming before Disney decided to cancel Phil wasn't it? I know it's been in "production" or "pre-production" before Phil was cancelled. And it's likely that when they cancelled Phil that they sped up production on Hannah. But I think it's wrong to say that any DC show "replaced" any other show unless it's a direct spin off like "Cory in the House."
|
|
|
Post by friendspheely5604 on Jan 16, 2007 17:53:32 GMT -5
No, they literally took the money for the 3rd season of Phil and decided to make Cory in the House.
|
|
|
Post by pheelygirlxoxo on Jan 16, 2007 18:30:04 GMT -5
No, they literally took the money for the 3rd season of Phil and decided to make Cory in the House. seriously? where'd you hear that???
|
|
|
Post by 1PhEeLyGuRl on Jan 16, 2007 19:05:52 GMT -5
Why would they do that!?
|
|
|
Post by linda06 on Jan 17, 2007 14:13:14 GMT -5
Because they're a bunch of idiots that wouldn't know a good thing if it came up and punched them in the face
|
|
|
Post by anitrain on Jan 17, 2007 14:36:59 GMT -5
No, they literally took the money for the 3rd season of Phil and decided to make Cory in the House. They didn't pick up Cory until months after [/i]Phil[/i]ended. At best, one could argue that Cory took Haversham Hall[/u]'s funding which was taken from Phil. Of course, none of this helps us any, so why are we arguing about it?
|
|
|
Post by friendspheely5604 on Jan 17, 2007 22:11:03 GMT -5
No, they literally took the money for the 3rd season of Phil and decided to make Cory in the House. They didn't pick up Cory until months after [/i]Phil[/i]ended. At best, one could argue that Cory took Haversham Hall[/u]'s funding which was taken from Phil. Of course, none of this helps us any, so why are we arguing about it?[/quote] So? that doesn't mean that they didn't take the money from Phil, I geuss you could say that HH did, but I specifically heard Cory took it, but whatev.
|
|
|
Post by princessbeatrice on Jan 19, 2007 13:35:31 GMT -5
wait so HH wasn't the show that tooks Phil's money?
not that is importants sanymore since as much as I love Aly & AJ I don't know if I would watch the show even if it was filmed after Phil's 3rd season...the plot was just crappy...and I don't like the ''acting together siblings'' kind of thing
and Cory in the house I wouldn't watch anyways
|
|
|
Post by *PotF*roxmyworld on Feb 10, 2007 15:12:51 GMT -5
Whatever the reason, all of Disneys new series are doing great (ratings wise anyways), and I doubt they would make another season. A DCOM perhaps, but not another season.
|
|
missalyss19
Stranded Time Traveler
Cookie Monster Jason!
Posts: 20
|
Post by missalyss19 on Mar 1, 2007 15:47:11 GMT -5
If not a third season, I would love for Disney to put out a DCOM. I waited two seasons for them to get together, and I want to see it for more than one episode, darn it!
|
|